Synthetic Food Dyes and the Link with Serious Health Consequences

By Chemical-Free-Life.org

Overview

     One group of synthetic and industrialized food chemicals extensively studied and linked with adverse health reactions is artificial food dyes.  This becomes particularly problematic when one considers just how prevalent synthetic food dyes have become in the U.S. diet.  Unless consumers carefully examine the ingredients labels, they are likely unaware just how many products they bring home to their families contain synthetic food dyes.  The dyes are present in hundreds of processed food items in U.S. grocery stores in everything from breakfast cereals, pickles, salad dressings, and pie crusts, to sports drinks.  A 2014 report released by the FDA estimates that at least 96 percent of children aged 2-5 years are exposed to synthetic food dyes Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6 and Blue 1.

The FDA has approved these synthetic dyes, so should consumers even be concerned?  A recent review of the empirical studies on food dyes revealed: “The food industry dumps over 15 million pounds of the dyes studied into the food supply each year. Three of the dyes carry known carcinogens, and four can cause serious allergic reactions in some consumers. New studies show that seven of them contributed to cancer in lab animals, including brain and testicular tumors, colon cancer, and mutations” (Curran, 2010).

Approximately 10,000 new processed food products are introduced every year in the United States. Almost all of them require additives not required by the FDA to be explicitly named in all ingredient lists, and may sometimes be represented under “natural coloring” or “added coloring.” It has been known to cause severe allergic reactions and anaphylactic shock in some people.”

~ Brenda Watson & Leonard Smith, M.D., food additive authors

A closer look

Yellow Dye #5, Tartrazine

The food dye Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow dye #5) appears to cause the most adverse reactions of all azo dyes (azos are nitrogen-based compound derivatives of diazene and azobenzene or diphenyldiazene). Over 70 years of scientific, empirical studies and clinical trials on humans have linked this dye to numerous negative health outcomes and as leading to a particular problem for those with asthma and aspirin intolerance. More specifically, Yellow 5 dye/Tartrazine has been linked in empirical studies and clinical trials to respiratory problems, bronchospasms and asthma, urticaria/skin reactions, anaphylactic shock, irritability, restlessness, and insomnia/sleep disturbances, and in children, behavioral problems including ADHD and learning difficulties. Animal studies have found a link with Tartrazine and generalized toxicity/genotoxicity, as well as adverse immunosuppressive effects. Clinical trials have suggested a link between Yellow Dye 5/Tartrazine and hyperactivity disorders/ADHD symptoms and learning difficulties in children, especially when it is combined with the preservative sodium benzoate.

Decades of clinical and consumer reports also reveal a litany of problematic reactions to Yellow 5 dye including allergies, asthma, breathing difficulties, feelings of suffocation, skin reactions including urticaria (hives), itching, swelling/edema/fluid retention (and subsequent weight gain), blurred vision, swollen lymph nodes, earaches, headaches, migraines, difficulty concentrating, depression, anxiousness, anxiety, irritability, general weakness, rhinitis, sinus problems, heat waves, restlessness, sleep disturbances/insomnia, cancer (especially thyroid tumors), sperm abnormalities, lymphomas, chromosomal damage and anaphylactic shock.

The FDA’s position on Tartrazine is that it prompts only minor adverse reactions in some people. In response to the FDA’s failure to protect the public from the potential dangers of this food dye in 2008 the Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a regulatory petition with the FDA requesting that this food dye be removed from the permitted food coloring list. To date, Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow dye #5) remains a permitted food dye in U.S. foods and, while like other food dyes it is required to appear on ingredients listings, there are no consumer warning labels on products containing it.

The food dye Yellow 5 (Tartrazine) is widely used in processed foods and can be commonly found in breakfast cereals, snack foods, candies, sodas, sports drinks, sauces, dips, salad dressings, pickles, pepperoncini, baked goods, pastry, pie crusts, cookies, prepared boxed and frozen meals, and condiments, among many others. This dye is also commonly found in conventional, catered and fast food restaurant items, a variety of personal care products such as mouthwash, and over the counter vitamins and medicines and prescription drugs. It may also be in pet food.

Caramel Coloring Food Dye

Several recent studies on caramel food coloring suggest this food dye may pose serious health consequences for consumers. Caramel food dye (an exempt-from-certification color additive) is common in many processed foods such as soda, baked goods and candy. Synthetic caramel coloring is processed with the use of sulfites which are recognized by the medical and research community as potentially dangerous to people with asthma and other health conditions. Toxicological data from clinical trials and animal research studies indicate this food dye is an immunosuppressive and can trigger allergic reactions in some people. Further, it is a known hidden source of gluten which can trigger serious adverse reactions in people with certain autoimmune disorders.

Additionally, several recent studies have linked caramel food coloring to cancer. Following the release of one such study the Center for Science in the Public Interest, along with five independent food science experts, filed a regulatory petition with the FDA requesting that caramel coloring be removed from the permitted food coloring list, citing FDA policy which allows the use of colors the agency believes have “a reasonable certainty of no harm” while color additives that have been found to cause cancer in animals or humans are disallowed in FDA-regulated foods and drugs. The cancer risk of caramel coloring is associated with 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI) exposures (which occurs during the manufacturing process of caramel coloring) primarily through soda consumption. While there is currently no federal limit for 4-MEI in food or beverages, Consumer Reports (sponsors of one of the studies) petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to set limits for the potential carcinogen last year. There are typically four levels of color and chemical intensity that can be used with this food dye, the highest level (the darkest color and the highest levels of chemicals contained such as ammonia and sulfites—as well as producing the highest levels of 4-methylimidazole) has been determined by the state of California to be a carcinogenic risk and must be labeled as such on products sold in that state. Cola manufacturers, one of the most common users of caramel food dye, have responded by choosing to lower the level of caramel coloring in their products but recent testing by an independent laboratory found that at least one of the major cola producers was not in compliance with that requirement.

“Soft drink consumers are being exposed to an avoidable and unnecessary cancer risk from an ingredient that is being added to these beverages simply for aesthetic purposes. This unnecessary exposure poses a threat to public health and raises questions about the continued use of caramel coloring in soda.”
~Keeve Nachman, PhD, senior study author, Director of the Food Production and Public Health Program at the CLF, Assistant professor Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

As a footnote to this topic, Nestlé Corporation has announced that in response to consumer preferences, by the end of 2015 the company would be removing synthetic dyes (including Yellow 5, Tartrazine and Red 40) and artificial flavoring from 250 items in its product line, including some best-selling chocolate candies. The company noted in the press release that they are also actively working to eventually eliminate ‘Caramel Food Dye’ from their products—a decision that, in conjunction with the choice to eliminate nonexempt synthetic dyes and flavorings, will no doubt eventually further enhance sales and customer loyalty, especially given the number of people currently avoiding food products containing caramel food dye.

The rest of the cast: Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3, Red 2, Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 6

Previous studies on the other food dyes have been linked to adverse neurobehavioral effects. A recent public information report presented a review of the study findings on food dyes revealing to consumers that clinical studies and laboratory research examining the link between several FDA-approved food coloring and adverse consequences has been taking place for decades…

Blue Dye 1: Banned in at least two other countries, FD&C Blue #1 has been linked in animal studies to chromosomal damage. When ingested in food items FD&C Blue #1 has been linked with triggering hypersensitivity reactions in some people, and according to a 2003 U.S. Food and Drug Administration report, when used in enteral feeding tubes can lead to systemic toxicity and death. This synthetic food dye is found in a wide variety of processed food items including breakfast cereal, candies, soda, and baked goods, among others.

Blue Dye 2: Animal studies on FD&C Blue #2 first indicated a statistically significant incidence of tumors (including brain tumors) as far back as three decades ago and in 2003 was determined by the World Health Organization to have toxicity risks in patient feeding tubes, “FD&C Blue No. 2, may have similar if not greater toxicity potential than Blue No. 1 and would not be appropriate replacements”. This synthetic food dye is found in a wide variety of processed food items including breakfast cereal, candies, processed drinks, and baked goods, among others. Blue dye 2 may also be present in pet food.

Green Dye 3: Scientific animal studies have linked the synthetic food dye Green 3 with bladder and testes tumors. Consumer and clinical reports indicate sensitivities and allergic reactions to this food dye may include gastrointestinal and digestive problems such as stomach distress and diarrhea, skin reactions, and breathing problems, among others. Green Dye 3 can be found in a wide variety of processed foods including baked goods, ice cream, candy, snack foods, condiments, and beverages (including green beer, milkshakes and other popular St. Patrick’s Day offerings). This synthetic dye can also be found in numerous over the counter and prescription drugs, lipsticks and other cosmetics, and a variety of personal care products.

Red Dye 2: FD&C Red #2 (Citrus Red) is typically reserved for use on some orange peels. Red Dye #2 has been linked with allergic reactions including skin reactions such as urticaria, swelling, and angioedema. Scientific animal studies have linked this dye with carcinogenic tumors.

Red Dye 3: FD&C Red #3 (Erythrosine) has been linked to cancer and thyroid tumors in scientific animal studies and may be genotoxic, though the FDA has been clear that it does not agree that these findings are persuasive enough to reverse their position that these food dyes are safe for consumers.

Consumer and clinical reports indicate that Red Dye #3 may trigger breathing difficulties and other allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. This dye can be found in a variety of processed foods including candies, bakery goods, sausage casings, maraschino cherries, fruit roll-ups and other snack foods, frozen meals and desserts, to name a few. It may also be present in over the counter and prescription drugs and chewing gum.

Red Dye 40: FD&C Red #40 contains a known carcinogenic contaminant (aniline) and has been linked in animal studies to intrauterine developmental problems, behavioral and physical toxicity, genotoxicity, and colon DNA damage. Red Dye 40 has been linked in clinical trials with allergy-like hypersensitivity in a small number of adults (including skin reactions such as itching and hives, swelling/edema, digestion problems, earaches, swollen lymph nodes, and agitation, nervousness, and migraine headaches) and as a potential trigger for hyperactivity in children. This widely used food dye makes an appearance in numerous processed foods including breakfast cereals and toaster pastries, candies, chocolate, pudding mix, cake mixes, snack chips, desserts, bakery goods (including refrigerated and frozen dinner rolls), processed drinks such as orange soda and other flavored sodas and drink mixes marketed to children. It may also be present in over the counter and prescription drugs, as well as pet food.

Yellow Dye 6: FD&C Yellow #6 (Sunset yellow) has been linked in empirical scientific research studies to allergic reactions and gastroenteritis, adverse reproductive and neurobehavioral effects, and cancer. It has also be demonstrated in a case study to trigger anaphylactic shock in sensitive individuals. Despite their acknowledgment of the findings on FD&C Yellow #6:

“Industry-sponsored animal tests indicated that this dye, the third most widely used, may cause tumors of the adrenal gland and kidney. In addition, small amounts of several carcinogens, such as 4-aminobiphenyl and benzidine (or chemicals that the body converts to those substances) may contaminate dye Yellow #6”

after reviewing those data the FDA concluded that Yellow Dye 6 does not pose a significant cancer risk to humans. And while the FDA also acknowledges that Yellow Dye 6 “may cause occasional and sometimes severe hypersensitivity reactions in some people,” their final position is that this food dye is safe for public consumption sans warning labels.

Dye Yellow 6 (Sunset Yellow) is commonly found in a wide variety of processed foods including breakfast cereals, snack foods, candies, sodas, sports drinks, sauces, dips, salad dressings, baked goods, pastry, pie crusts, cookies, prepared boxed and frozen meals, and condiments, among many others. It can also be found in conventional and fast food restaurant food items.

“Our study (Weiss, et al., 1980) was funded by the FDA, and its results, along with a number of others from that period,
definitively demonstrated adverse behavioral effects of synthetic food colors (Weiss 1982).
During the intervening years, with a plethora of confirmations,
the FDA has remained blindly obstinate.
It continues to shield food additives from testing for neurotoxicity and apparently believes that adverse
behavioral responses are not an expression of toxicity.”

~Dr. Bernard Weiss

Why are these synthetic dyes in the U.S. food supply?

There have been numerous screenings, tests and reviews concerning the safety of a variety of food colorings over the years. The FDA has consistently concluded that the evidence weighs in favor of determining the aforementioned food dyes safe for consumers, maintaining that colors found to be potentially hazardous have already been purged from the list of permissible additives. Not everyone interprets the data the same way, however. Citing numerous research findings linking synthetic food dyes with serious adverse health consequences, in 2008 The Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a Citizens Regulatory Petition requesting that the FDA ban these food dyes. In March 2011 the FDA reviewed the data on several food dyes and again declared them safe for human consumption.

For more information visit:  https://chemical-free-life.org/

 

References:
Ahearn, A. & Weiss, B. 2010. Neurobehavioral effects of artificial food dyes. Environmental Health Perspectives. DOI:10.1289/ehp.trp100110
Baer, R. & Leider, L. 1949. The effects of feeding certified food Azo Dyes in para-phenylenediamine-hypersensitive subjects. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 13(5):223-232.
Blumenthal, D. Red No. 3 and other colorful controversies, FDA Consumer, 1990.
Brown, J., et al. 1980. Synthesis of 14C-labelled FD&C Blue No. 1 (Brilliant Blue FCF) and its intestinal absorption. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 18: 1-5.
Brown, J., et al. 1978. Mutagenicity testing of certified food colors and related Azo, Xanthene and Triphenylmethane dyes with the salmonella/microsome system. Mutation Research, 56(3): 249-271.
Buist, B., Ph.D., Food chemical sensitivity, New York: Prism Press, 1987.
Carlisle, P. The Food Hacker’s Handbook: A Guide to Breaking the Processed Food Additives Addiction, Scheduled publication: 2015.
Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI). 2011. Citizens Regulatory Petition to Bar the Use of Caramel Colorings Produced With Ammonia and Containing the Carcinogens 2-Methylimidazole and 4-Methylimidazole. Filed with the Dockets Management Division, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI). 2008. Citizen Regulatory Petition from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) Requesting the Revocation of the Color Additive Approvals of Eight Synthetic Dyes or Use in Food.Specifics of Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services: Requesting Removal of Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow # 5) and to Ban the Use of Tartrazine and the Use of Other Food Dyes, and in the Interim to Require a Warning on Foods Containing These Dyes, to Correct the Information the Food and Drug Administration Gives to Consumers On the Impact of These Dyes on the Behavior of Some Children, and to Require Neurotoxicity Testing of New Food Additives and Food Colors.
Ceserani, R., et al. 1978. Tartrazine and prostaglandin system. Prostaglandins Medicine, 1(6):499-505.
Chafee, F. & Settipane, G. 1967. Asthma caused by FD&C approved dyes. Journal of Allergy, 40(2): 65-72.
Chung, K., et al. 1981. Mutagenicity testing of some commonly used dyes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 42(4): 641-648.
Collins, T. & Black, T. 1980. Effects of FD&C Red No. 40 on rat intrauterine development. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 18(6): 561.
Consumer Reports, Some soda contains a potential carcinogen: New Consumer Reports’ study shows many Americans drink enough to put their health at risk, February 18, 2015.
Consumer Reports, Caramel color: The health risk that may be in your soda, February 10, 2014.
Corder, E. & Buckley, C. 1995. Aspirin, Salicylate, Sulfite and Tartrazine induced bronchoconstriction: Safe doses and case definition in epidemiological studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,48(10):1269-1275.
Curran, L. Food dyes linked to cancer, ADHD, allergies. Food Safety News, July 8, 2010.
Dacre, J. 1965. Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies on Citrus Red No. 2. Proceedings from the University of Otago Medical School, 43: 31-33.
Davis, K., Fitzhugh, O. & Nelson, A. 1964. Chronic rat and dog toxicity studies on Tartrazine. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 6: 621-626.
Dubik, M. 2004. Food colorings, preservatives, and hyperactivity. American Academy of Pediatrics, Grand Rounds, 1295): 54-55.
Elhkim, M., et al. 2007. New considerations regarding the risk assessment on Tartrazine: An update toxicological assessment, intolerance reactions and maximum theoretical daily intake in France. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 47(3): 308-316.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2011. EFSA Establishes New ADIs for Caramel Colours: ANS Panel Revisions on Caramel Food Coloring.
Feingold, Ben. 1976. Hyperkinesis and Learning Disabilities Linked to the Ingestion of Artificial Food Colors and Flavors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9(9): 19-27.
Freedman, B. 1977. Asthma induced by Sulphur Dioxide, Benzoate and Tartrazine contained in orange drinks. Clinical Allergy, 7(5):407-415.
Gleason, S. Artificial food dyes scrutinized by FDA. Wall Street Journal. March 29, 2011.
Greenhawt, M. & Baldwin, J. 2008. Food colorings and flavors. In Food allergy: Adverse reactions to foods and food additives, Fourth Ed., edited by D. Metcalfe, H. Sampson & R. Simon (Eds.) (Chapter 34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Gross, P., et al. 1989. Additive allergy: Allergic gastroenteritis due to Yellow Dye #6. Annals of Internal Medicine 111(1): 87-88.
Hariparsad, D., et al. 1984. Oral Tartrazine challenge in childhood asthma: effect on bronchial reactivity. Clinical Allergy, 14(1):81-85.
Haveland-Smith, R. & Combes, R. 1980. Screening of food dyes for genotoxicity. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 18: 215-221.
Haveland-Smith, R., et al. 1979. Methodology for the testing of food dyes for genotoxic activity: experiments with Red 2G (C.I. 18050). Mutation Research, 64(4): 241-248.
Hesse, B. 1914. Analysis of the coal tar-dye industry. The Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 6(12): 972.
Honohan, T., et al. 1977. Intestinal absorption of polymeric derivatives of the food dyes Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine in rats. Xenobiotica, 7(12): 765-774.
Houben, G., et al. 1993. Immunotoxic effects of the color additive Caramel Color III: Immune function studies in rats. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 20(1):30-37.
Jenkins, P., et al. 1982. Adverse drug reaction to Sunset-Yellow in rifampicin-isoniazid tablet. Lancet, 2(8294): 385.
Jones, R., et al. 1964. The metabolism and excretion of Tartrazine in the rat, rabbit and man. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 2: 447-452.
Kobylewski, S. & Jacobson, M. 2010. Food dyes: A rainbow of risks. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) publication, Washington, D.C.
Koutsogeorgopoulou L., et al. 1998. Immunological aspects of the common food colorants, Amaranth and Tartrazine. Veterinary and Human Toxicology, 40(1):1-4.
Lagakos, S.. & Mosteller, F.. 1981. A case study of statistics in the regulatory process: The FD&C Red No. 40 experiments. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 66(1): 197-212.
Lancaster, F. & Lawrence, J. 1999. Determination of Benzidine in the food colours Tartrazine and Sunset Yellow FCF, by reduction and derivitization followed by high performance liquid chromatography. Food Additives and Contaminants, 16: 381-390.
Layton, L. FDA panel rejects need for warnings on food coloring. Washington Post, March 31, 2011.
Lethco, E. & Webb, J. 1966. The fate of FD&C Blue No. 2 in rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 154(2): 384-389.
Lin, G. & Brusick, D. 1986. Mutagenicity studies on FD&C Red No.3. Mutagenesis, 1(4): 253-259.
Lockey, S. 1977. Hypersensitivity to Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow No. 5) and other dyes and additives present in foods and pharmaceutical products. Annals of Allergy, 38(3):206-210.
Michaelsson, G. & Juhlin, L. 1973. Urticaria induced by preservatives and dye additives in food and drugs. British Journal of Dermatology, 88(6): 525-532.
Moon, J. & Shibamoto, T. 2011. Formation of carcinogenic 4(5)-Methylimidazole in maillard reaction systems. The National Toxicology Program, the Division of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59 (2): 615–618.
Moutinho I., Bertges, L. & Assis, R. 2007. Prolonged use of the food dye Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow No 5) and its effects on the gastric mucosa of Wistar rats. Brazalian Journal of Biology, 67 (1): 141–145.

Murakami, M., et al. 2001. DNA damage induced by Red Food Dyes orally administered to pregnant and male mice. Toxicological Sciences, 261(1):92-99.
Nachman, K., “Popular soda ingredient, Caramel Color, poses cancer risk to consumers.” Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. ScienceDaily, 18 February, 2015.
National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2007. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 4-Methylimidazole (CAS No. 822-36-6) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (Feed Studies). National Toxicology Program Technical Report Series, (535):1-274.
National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2004. Toxicity Report Series Number 67. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of 2- and 4-Methylimidazole. NIH Publication No.04-4409.
National Toxicology Program (NTP). 1981. Carcinogenesis bioassay of FD&C Yellow No. 6. Case No. 2783-94-0.
Neuman, I., et al. 1978. The danger of “Yellow dyes” (Tartrazine) to allergic subjects. Clinical Allergy, 8(1): 65-68.
Patterson, R. & Butler, J. 1982. Tartrazine-induced chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 20(4): 461-465.
Peiperl, M., et al. 1995. Determination of combined Benzidine in FD&C Yellow No. 6 (Sunset Yellow). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 33(10): 829-839.
Price, P., et al. 1978. In vitro and in vivo indications of the carcinogenicity and toxicity of food dyes. International Journal of Cancer, 21(3): 361-367.
Prival, M., et al. 1993. Determination of combined Benzidine in FD&C Yellow No. 5 (Tartrazine), using a highly sensitive analytical method. Food and Chemical Toxicology,31(10): 751-758.
Radomski, J. 1974. Toxicology of food colors. Annual Review of Pharmacology, 14: 127 -137.
Radomski, J. 1961. The absorption, fate, and excretion of Citrus Red No. 2 (2,5-Dimethoxyphenyl-Azo-2-Naphthol) and external D&C Red No. 14 (1-Xylylazo-2-Naphthol). Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 134: 100-109.
Radomski, J. & Mellinger, T. 1962. The absorption, fate and excretion in rats of the water-soluble azo dyes, FD&C Red No. 2, FD&C Red No. 4, and FD&C Yellow No. 6. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,136: 259-266.
Rafii, F., et al. 1997. Mutagenicity of azo dyes used in foods, drugs and cosmetics before and after reduction by Clostridium species from the human intestinal tract. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 35(9): 897-901.
Rowe, K. & Rowe, K. 1994. Synthetic food coloring and behavior: A dose response effect in a double-blind, placebo-controlled repeated-measures study. Journal of Pediatrics,125(5,pt.1): 691-698.
Ryan, A., Welling, P. & Wright, S. 1969. Further studies on the metabolism of Tartrazine and related compounds in the intact rat. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 7(4): 287-295.
Sankaya, R., Selvi, M. & Erkoc, F. 2012. Evaluation of potential genotoxicity of five food dyes using the somatic mutation and recombination test. Chemosphere,88(8): 974-979.
Settipane, G., et al. 1976. Significance of Tartrazine sensitivity in chronic urticaria of unknown etiology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 57(6): 541-546.
Sharratt, M., et al. 1966. Biological effects of Citrus Red No. 2 in the mouse. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 4(5): 493-502.
Smith, T.J., et al. 2015. Caramel Color in soft drinks and exposure to 4-Methylimidazole: A quantitative risk assessment. PLOS ONE, 10 (2): e0118138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.011838
Stevenson, D. 1986. Adverse reactions to Tartrazine. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 78:182-191.
Swanson, J. & Kinsbourne, M. 1980. Food dyes impair performance of hyperactive children on a laboratory learning test. Science, 207:1485-1487.
Tabar, A., et al. 2003. Asthma and allergy due to Carmine Dye. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 26(Suppl 2):65-73.
Tanaka, T. 2006. Reproductive and neurobehavioural toxicity study of Tartrazine administered to mice in the diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44 (2): 179–187.
Tanaka, T. 1996. Reproductive and neurobehavioral effects of Sunset Yellow FCF administered to mice in their diet. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 12(1): 69-79.
Tanaka T., et al. 2008. Effects of Tartrazine on exploratory behavior in a three-generation toxicity study in mice. Reproductive Toxicology, 26(2): 156–163.
Thuvander A. & Oskarsson, A. 1994. Effects of subchronic exposure to Caramel Colour III on the Immune system in mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology, National Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden, 32(1):7-13.
Trautlein, J. & Mann, W. 1978. Anaphylactic shock caused by Yellow Dye (FD&C No. 5 and FD&C No. 6) in an enema (Case report). Annals of Allergy, 41(1): 28-29.
Tsuda, S., et al. 2001. DNA damage induced by Red Food Dyes orally administered to pregnant and male mice. Toxicological Sciences, 261(1):92-99.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2011. Exposure Estimate for FD&C Colors for the U.S. Population, presented at the 248th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, August 13, 2014.
http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/FoodAdvisoryCommittee/ucm149740.htm
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2003. FDA Public Health Advisory: Reports of Blue Discoloration and Death in Patients Receiving Enteral Feedings Tinted With The Dye, FD&C Blue No. 1, September 29.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1988. Public Citizen v FDA: FD&C Blue No. 2: Final Decision Following a Formal Evidentiary Public Hearing in an Adjudicatory Proceeding, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Circuit 87: 1237.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1987. FD&C Blue No. 2: Final Decision Following a Formal Evidentiary Public Hearing in an Adjudicatory Proceeding. Department of Health and Human Services, Docket No. 83N-0009.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1986. Permanent Listing of FD&C Yellow No. 6; Final rule. Federal Register, 51: 41765-41783.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1985. FD&C Yellow No. 5; Food and Drug Administration Action: Final Rule, Removal of Stay. Federal Register, 50: 35774-35783.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1983. Final Rule Permanently Listing FD&C Blue No. 2. Federal Register, 48: 5253-5261.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1982. Final Rule Permanently Listing FD&C Green No. 3. Federal Register, 47: 52140.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1982. Final Rule Permanently Listing FD&C Blue No. 1. Federal Register, 47: 42563.
Vorhees, C., et al. 1983. Developmental toxicity and psychotoxicity of FD&C Red Dye No. 40 (Allura Red AC) in rats. Toxicology, 28(3):207-217.
Ward, N. 1990. The influence of the chemical additive Tartrazine on the zinc status of hyperactive children:A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Journal Of Nutritional Medicine, 1 (1):51-58.
Washington Post. House agrees to let FDA keep cherry dye on market. p. 19, July 19, 1989 issue.
Weiss B. 1982. Food additives and environmental chemicals as sources of childhood behavior disorders. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21:144–152.
Weiss, B., et al. 1980. Behavioral responses to artificial food colors. Science, 207(4438):1487-1489.
World Health Organization (WHO). Blue Discoloration and Death from FD&C Blue No. 1. WHO Drug Information, 17(4), 2003.